What are sufficient conditions, then, for triangles to be congruent?
Side-angle-side
The fundamental conditions for congruence are that two sides and the included angle of one triangle be equal to two sides and the included angle of the other.
Euclid proved this by supposing one triangle actually placed on the other, and allowing the equal sides and equal angle to coincide. He then argued that the remaining sides must also coincide. (You might perform this mental experiment yourself.) This is called proof by superposition. And it is out of favor these days. It was even called into question in Euclid's time -- why not prove every theorem by superposition?
If superposition, then, is the only way to see the truth of a proposition, then that proposition ranks with our basic understanding; it is a kind of mental, experimental result; and therefore it should be a first principle, not a theorem.
Nowadays, this proposition is accepted as a postulate. We shall not prove it either.
PROPOSITION 4
If two triangles have two sides equal to two sides respectively, and if the angles contained by those sides are also equal, then the remaining side will equal the remaining side, the triangles themselves will be equal areas, and the remaining angles will be equal, namely those that are opposite the equal sides.
Let triangles ABC, DEF have the two sides AB, BC equal to the two sides DE, EF respectively;
and let angle B equal E;
then the remaining side AC will equal the remaining side DF,
the triangles themselves will be equal areas,
and angle A, opposite side BC, will equal angle D, opposite the equal side EF,
and angle C, opposite side AB, will equal angle F, opposite the equal side DE.
The expression equal "respectively" means each one to each one. It is in distinction to "together" equal, which would mean that the AB, BC when added would equal DE, EF when added.
It is common to refer to this proposition as "S. A. S.": Side-Angle-Side. When that condition is satisfied, the two triangles will be equal in all respects.
Here are examples of how we use S.A.S. to prove equality.
Example 1. Let ABC, CDE be triangles with AC equal to CE,
DC equal to CB, and angle ACB equal to angle DCE.
Which other angles are equal?
Solution. Even though we may see that the triangles are congruent (S.A.S.), it may not be immediately clear which are the equal angles. They are those that are opposite the equal sides:
Angle A, opposite side BC, is equal to angle E, opposite the equal side DC;
and angle B, opposite side AC, is equal to angle D, opposite the equal side CE.
Example 2. In this figure, AB is equal to AC, and AE is equal to AD. Prove that BE is equal to DC.
Solution. The student should see the overlapping triangles ABE, ACD. Then, since AB is equal to AC, and AE to AD,
the two sides AB, BE (of triangle ABE) are equal to the two sides AC, CD (of triangle ACD) respectively;
and those sides contain a common angle, angle BAC;
therefore -- S.A.S. -- the remaining side of triangle ABE is equal to the remaining side of triangle ACD: BE is equal to DC.
Which is what we wanted to prove.
We see, then, that the elementary way to show that lines or angles are equal, is to show that they are corresponding parts of congruent triangles.
As we continue however, we will see that congruence -- coinciding -- is just one condition for equality. For, isn't it possible that a straight line might be equal in length to a curved line? And aren't there two squares that together might enclose the same area as one square? We will want to extend our knowledge of figures beyond simple congruence. The issue will be equality itself.
Please "turn" the page and do some Problems.
or
Continue on to the next proposition.
Previous proposition
Table of Contents | Introduction | Home
Please make a donation to keep TheMathPage online.
Even $1 will help.
Copyright © 2006-2007 Lawrence Spector
Questions or comments?
E-mail: themathpage@nyc.rr.com